User talk:Ak120/archived

2019



Can you explain what you consider an API since you have been changing a lot of pages that says "xxx API" to "xxx Functions". According to you what does the API page has to contain to be called API and not only "functions". I will check with someone else your opinion about the Data Types and take a decision about that. Martini (talk) 15:14, 18 August 2017 (CEST)

Hi Andreas. On C Set ++ Newsletter‎ you said it is a wrong category, you delete it, but didn't assign any new category. Martini (talk) 15:39, 25 August 2017 (CEST)

Untrue claims about "Removing Code"

Glossaries

Martini (talk) 03:42, 12 November 2017 (CET)Andreas, why are you breaking the Glossary category? Please talk before doing that things.

Actually I didn't break anything. The category "Glossary" should contain glossaries - quite simple. You tend to use it as a garbage disposal for stubs or orphaned stuff. Please read about the definition of a glossary before making wrong claims. Everything that's not a glossary doesn't qualify to be categorised there. --ak120 (talk) 17:37, 12 November 2017 (CET)

After doing corrections to orphaned 8 year old stuff

The lemma of each of them is wrong and misleading caused by improper copy. The code simply doesn't work. This pages were created by mistake sometimes back - there's simply no "Editing Into Java" article which would be wrong grammar anyways. The article "Into Java - Part XVI" links to working code instead of the reconstructed pollution. --ak120 (talk) 17:13, 22 February 2018 (CET)

That is not reason to delete content. The idea is to fix it, not to delete it. Your current changes and rename of pages seems more adequate than deleting pages. Martini (talk) 20:19, 22 February 2018 (CET)

Nothing was deleted by me as I can delete nothing as a normal user here. So I moved the orphaned content simply out of scope temporary. Nobody was fixing this stuff for almost 8 years. I also collected the greatest (s)hits under the Category:For Removal. But without administration it will last there until the server dies or the database becomes totally corrupted. It's more convenient to present source code in an usable form and not malformed in a garbage fashion.--ak120 (talk) 20:54, 22 February 2018 (CET)

You know what I mean when I said "deleted", you erase the content of the pages and that is why it is good that you don't have permission to delete pages. You erased the orphaned content that you orphaned when you changed the main article. STOP ERASING CONTENT (I hope that you understand that since you are always right.) Martini (talk) 23:03, 22 February 2018 (CET)

Auf solche dreisten und unbelegbaren Behauptungen lege ich keinen Wert. Statt vernünftiger Administration finden nur sinnlose Editwars statt - einfach nur jämmerlich. Mein Übersetzer ist leider erkrankt nachdem er all diesen Unfug lesen mußte. Sämtliche Änderungen, welche über mein Benutzerkonto hier stattfinden, werden zuvor sachlich geprüft. Als erste Maßnahme werde ich das Budget für Arbeitsleistungen bezüglich Fehlerberichtungen auf diesen Seiten um 90% kürzen lassen. Bereits vorhandene Korrekturen werden noch nach Bedarf hier eingepflegt. Englische Übersetzungen, welche ohnehin in der Praxis nicht relevant sind, werden zum Großteil entfallen.--ak120 (talk) 15:05, 23 February 2018 (CET)

So-called example source code

ak120 why are you removing the "Example Source Code" from the Data Types? It gives more information on how to use it. It is not a duplicated thing and it is usefull for developers that wants to start with the API Martini (talk) 14:07, 18 August 2017 (CEST)

It's quite simple. Because it was no source code at all. It only duplicates the above information in unformatted (pre) text. Even uneducated C programmers get no additional information from it. And Data types and API a two different topics btw.--ak120 (talk) 14:49, 18 August 2017 (CEST)

Unnecessary Sarcasm and pejorative intended comments

Andreas. Your use of sarcasm and pejorative comments are not useful and makes me wonder about your lack of people skill. Please stop comments like:

• "creator seems to be lazy"
• "boring"
• "please display the titles at least correctly"
• " jeder Unfug findet sich auch ein zweites Mal" = "every nonsense is found a second time"
• "copy'n'paste mania"
• "katastrophale" = "disastrous"
• "unnütz" = useless

I would like to also state that you also leave good comments about your changes sometimes.

If you consider boring your contribution to the EDM/2, or you like to insult other people by considering them lazy under your opinion it is better that you stop the collaborative work. Otherwise it is better to moderate yourself.

Maybe you consider "People Skill" as an unnecessary set of skills, but this kind of comments adds up to the reason why people are no longer collaborating on the EDM/2 wiki. I got complains in the past from two people that stopped helping on this wiki because of you. Now I understand them better.

Regards Martini (talk) 15:39, 2 January 2020 (CET)

It's simply boring to fix all the time the same stuff. There's no evidence for your allegations. The typists are paid by me and not from your imaginary collaborationists. They have my order to leave markers at some places for our engine. The error detection reports clearly more than 90% of the newly added content as improperly copied and pasted. Please use the discussion function and somebody who edited the specific section can answer and justify the action based on facts and published papers which can unfortunately not be referenced automatically as long this site lacks administration and features. Good-bye! --ak120 (talk) 17:58, 2 January 2020 (CET)

Please tell your typist to stop using sarcasm and pejorative language on their comments. You are again using pejorative language to consider the people that complain about you "imaginary". Martini (talk) 18:09, 2 January 2020 (CET)

Sorry I tried to use simplified English language because my foreign language correspondence clerk finished her work a couple of hours ago. Please show me an evidence where and when unlawful actions took place from my account here. In fact we neutralized pejorative content and wrong claims at some sections here recently. Adieu --ak120 (talk) 18:37, 2 January 2020 (CET)

Martini (talk) 18:47, 2 January 2020 (CET)

This is how you react when shown evidence. You ignore everything, get angry, and delete the page.

Please take this two ban weeks to cool of and possible get professional help. 15:46, 3 January 2020 (CET)

Hinweise

Bitte nutzen Sie hier nur Verweise auf die entsprechende Diskussionsseite! Unsignierte Beiträge (Spam) oder sonstiger Schwachsinn werden rücksichtslos entfernt!

Danke! --ak120 (talk) 12:03, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Andreas. It seems to me that you are trying to hide your bad attitude and the rudeness that you (and/or you collaborators) use on this wiki. Stop posting on comments german (and any other non English language) with the exception of non-english articles. If you continue with the rudeness and sarcasm I will ban you again. Please say that to you "supposed" team of collaborators that like to erase things. Martini (talk) 01:33, 20 January 2020 (UTC)