Acucorp: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 21:00, 30 December 2023

Acucorp (1988-2007) was based in San Diego, CA.

The company started in the latter half of the 90s to focus more on Windows based products and in 1997 introduced ACUCOBOL-GT, a GUI product that only ran on 32-bit Windows systems, it could co-operate to a degree with some of their classic products and the company continued to deliver and update "classic" versions of their COBOL product. However, their documentation increasingly mentioned only Microsoft database products, and it was not immediately clear from their homepage that they sold systems for anything but MS Windows.

The company was taken over by Micro Focus at 2007-05-04 and the ACUCOBOL line was discontinued, although MF still supports it.

Products

ACUCOBOL-85 - source code compatible with RM/COBOL
ACUCOBOL-GT
Acu4GL
AcuBench - Integrated Development Environment
AcuConnect
AcuEdit
AcuLaunch
AcuODBC
AcuScreens - GUI builder
AcuServer
AcuSQL
AcuView
AcuXUI - user interface engine

Revision as of 00:10, 30 July 2022 view source Ak120 (talk \| contribs) 35,819 edits mNo edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 21:00, 30 December 2023 view source Ak120 (talk \| contribs) 35,819 edits mNo edit summary
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Acucorp was based in San Diego, CA.		Acucorp (1988-2007) was based in San Diego, CA.

	The company started in the latter half of the 90s to focus more on Windows based products and in 1997 introduced ACUCOBOL-GT, a GUI product that only ran on 32-bit Windows systems, it could co-operate to a degree with some of their classic products and the company continued to deliver and update "classic" versions of their COBOL product. However, their documentation increasingly mentioned only Microsoft database products, and it was not immediately clear from their homepage that they sold systems for anything but MS Windows.		The company started in the latter half of the 90s to focus more on Windows based products and in 1997 introduced ACUCOBOL-GT, a GUI product that only ran on 32-bit Windows systems, it could co-operate to a degree with some of their classic products and the company continued to deliver and update "classic" versions of their COBOL product. However, their documentation increasingly mentioned only Microsoft database products, and it was not immediately clear from their homepage that they sold systems for anything but MS Windows.