Talk:AsuaCtl: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 00:46, 6 October 2016

A DLL should not be listed as a "library", since people will confuse that with classic libraries, i.e. set of pre-written functions for any give programming language

Done.--ak120 (talk) 00:46, 6 October 2016 (CEST)

Revision as of 09:45, 28 October 2015 view source Reiknir (talk \| contribs) Administrators 11,241 edits Created page with "A DLL should not be listed as a "library", since people will confuse that with classic libraries, i.e. set of pre-written functions for any give programming language"		Latest revision as of 00:46, 6 October 2016 view source Ak120 (talk \| contribs) 35,819 edits No edit summary
Line 1:		Line 1:
	A DLL should not be listed as a "library", since people will confuse that with classic libraries, i.e. set of pre-written functions for any give programming language		A DLL should not be listed as a "library", since people will confuse that with classic libraries, i.e. set of pre-written functions for any give programming language

			Done.--[[User:Ak120\|ak120]] ([[User talk:Ak120\|talk]]) 00:46, 6 October 2016 (CEST)