Talk:Free Pascal Compiler Review: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Prokushev: No. Lazarus not was not touched. We need native FPC first (without EMX, etc. libraries). | Prokushev: No. Lazarus not was not touched. We need native FPC first (without EMX, etc. libraries). | ||
Cris: OK. May I help with native FPC? Which kind of knowledge/experience is necessary? | |||
I just downloaded v1.9.6 of "native" FPC from www.freepascal.org. | |||
Revision as of 16:30, 3 May 2005
Is Lazarus must be ported?
Cris: yes, please. We have OpenSybil (WDSybil), but I think Lazarus could help improve the number of OS/2 projects that can be fulfilled. Especially now that a native FPC is coming along nicely. BTW, is there an undergoing effort to port Lazarus already? How can I join? And what about joining development for native OS/2 FPC?
Prokushev: No. Lazarus not was not touched. We need native FPC first (without EMX, etc. libraries).
Cris: OK. May I help with native FPC? Which kind of knowledge/experience is necessary? I just downloaded v1.9.6 of "native" FPC from www.freepascal.org.