Talk:Free Pascal Compiler Review: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
BTW, is there an undergoing effort to port Lazarus already? How can I join? | BTW, is there an undergoing effort to port Lazarus already? How can I join? | ||
And what about joining development for native OS/2 FPC? | And what about joining development for native OS/2 FPC? | ||
Prokushev: No. Lazarus not was not touched. We need native FPC first (without EMX, etc. libraries). | |||
Revision as of 06:17, 1 May 2005
Is Lazarus must be ported?
Cris: yes, please. We have OpenSybil (WDSybil), but I think Lazarus could help improve the number of OS/2 projects that can be fulfilled. Especially now that a native FPC is coming along nicely. BTW, is there an undergoing effort to port Lazarus already? How can I join? And what about joining development for native OS/2 FPC?
Prokushev: No. Lazarus not was not touched. We need native FPC first (without EMX, etc. libraries).