Talk:IBM OS/2 Warp Development Related Redbooks: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[User:Martini|Martini]] ([[User talk:Martini|talk]]) 17:38, 23 January 2017 (CET) Please explain your reason. I don't found the links to the original source unnecessary. | [[User:Martini|Martini]] ([[User talk:Martini|talk]]) 17:38, 23 January 2017 (CET) Please explain your reason. I don't found the links to the original source unnecessary. | ||
I don't know what you're talking about. I fixed, completed and added content to almost every section here. Please first read and realise the changes before making wrong claims. I set up links here to the original source instead of non working links, fixed the dated links, made the correct colums sortable for longer tables.--[[User:Ak120|ak120]] ([[User talk:Ak120|talk]]) 21:14, 30 January 2017 (CET) | |||
[[User:Martini|Martini]] ([[User talk:Martini|talk]]) 21:54, 30 January 2017 (CET) Again, instead of complaining, please explain yourself what do you mean with "dated links to IBM Library servers", do you mean "out-dated links?" | |||
I protected this page since you deleted some OpenLibrary links of books that are published there. | |||
Where I was complaining? Ok, "dated" can have different meanings in English, but here it should be clear from the context - something like datar/fechar. Otherwise I would have written outdated. I was very careful while editing to let your advertisement links inside, as long they didn't produce a 404.--[[User:Ak120|ak120]] ([[User talk:Ak120|talk]]) 22:07, 30 January 2017 (CET) | |||
[[User:Martini|Martini]] ([[User talk:Martini|talk]]) 22:14, 30 January 2017 (CET) Andreas, I disagree what you refer as "advertisement links" OpenLibrary is a non-profit library. Please remember this pages are a work in progress, if you delete things that are incomplete, they will never be completed. I'm sorry to protect pages, but I don't know why you like to edit the same pages I'm working on. | |||
==Sources== | |||
* https://web-docs.gsi.de/~kraemer/COLLECTION/IBM/redbooksindex.html | |||
* https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/* | |||
Latest revision as of 23:12, 24 April 2018
Please don't use dated links to IBM Library servers. That's totally unnecessary. --ak120 (talk) 00:08, 21 January 2017 (CET)
Martini (talk) 17:38, 23 January 2017 (CET) Please explain your reason. I don't found the links to the original source unnecessary.
I don't know what you're talking about. I fixed, completed and added content to almost every section here. Please first read and realise the changes before making wrong claims. I set up links here to the original source instead of non working links, fixed the dated links, made the correct colums sortable for longer tables.--ak120 (talk) 21:14, 30 January 2017 (CET)
Martini (talk) 21:54, 30 January 2017 (CET) Again, instead of complaining, please explain yourself what do you mean with "dated links to IBM Library servers", do you mean "out-dated links?" I protected this page since you deleted some OpenLibrary links of books that are published there.
Where I was complaining? Ok, "dated" can have different meanings in English, but here it should be clear from the context - something like datar/fechar. Otherwise I would have written outdated. I was very careful while editing to let your advertisement links inside, as long they didn't produce a 404.--ak120 (talk) 22:07, 30 January 2017 (CET)
Martini (talk) 22:14, 30 January 2017 (CET) Andreas, I disagree what you refer as "advertisement links" OpenLibrary is a non-profit library. Please remember this pages are a work in progress, if you delete things that are incomplete, they will never be completed. I'm sorry to protect pages, but I don't know why you like to edit the same pages I'm working on.