Actually I didn't break anything. The category "Glossary" should contain glossaries - quite simple. You tend to use it as a garbage disposal for stubs or orphaned stuff. Please read about the definition of a glossary before making wrong claims. Everything that's not a glossary doesn't qualify to be categorised there. --ak120 (talk) 17:37, 12 November 2017 (CET)
Rather than creating German categories, it would make sense to contact the Wiki owner (firstname.lastname@example.org) and ask him to enable German as a Wiki language, I know Martini has refused to add any languages but English on the OS/2 World wiki, but Adrian Gschwend being a native German speaker himself should see things in a slightly different light.
Just a friendly note here. If you replace <pre> with <code> you will have to place extra blank lines, otherwise
First line second line third line
I'm aware of this issue. But sometimes the macros not working correctly, and it's a lot of extra fixing manually. I wrote a message to (email@example.com) - but no response at all.--ak120 (talk) 15:29, 12 April 2016 (CEST)
ak120 why are you removing the "Example Source Code" from the Data Types? It gives more information on how to use it. It is not a duplicated thing and it is usefull for developers that wants to start with the API Martini (talk) 14:07, 18 August 2017 (CEST)
It's quite simple. Because it was no source code at all. It only duplicates the above information in unformatted (pre) text. Even uneducated C programmers get no additional information from it. And Data types and API a two different topics btw.--ak120 (talk) 14:49, 18 August 2017 (CEST)
Can you explain what you consider an API since you have been changing a lot of pages that says "xxx API" to "xxx Functions". According to you what does the API page has to contain to be called API and not only "functions". I will check with someone else your opinion about the Data Types and take a decision about that. Martini (talk) 15:14, 18 August 2017 (CEST)